The Blurb:
“North and South is a novel about rebellion. Moving from the industrial riots of discontented millworkers through to the unsought passions of a middle-class woman, and from religious crises of conscience to the ethics of naval mutiny, it poses fundamental questions about the nature of social authority and obedience. Through the story of Margaret Hale, the middle-class southerner who moves to the northern industrial town of Milton, Gaskell skilfully explores issues of class and gender in the conflict between Margaret’s ready sympathy with the workers and her growing attraction to the charismatic mill ownder, John Thornton. This new revised and expanded edition sets the novel in the context of Victorian social and medical debate.”
What I thought:
This book has it all: class conflict, politics, religion, women’s rights and passion! It makes you think, it makes you reflect on what was and it makes you ponder how we got from there to where we are now. We smile with them, we cry with them.
North and South (originally called Margaret Hale, after the pricipal character, until Charles Dickens made Gaskell change it) starts with a little rose-covered cottage in the countryside in the south of England where Margaret Hale lives with her Pastor Father, her mother and their servants. Margaret loves the outdoors; she loves to sketch nature and spends a carefree and idyllic youth milling around the land and helping neighbours with various acts of charity. Towards the end of Margaret’s teens, her father announces that he has abandoned the church and because of this the whole family is uprooted to Milton-Northern (apparantly based on Gaskell’s home town of Manchester) to start again.
Milton is an industrial town in the north of England and not only is the landscape the polar opposite of Margatet’s hometown of Helstone, with factories, smoke, noise and polution, but also the townsfolk are quite different from those she is used to. I found this very interesting, and this is why I think Dickens was absolutely right to make Gaskell change the title: there is still a divide even today between the north and the south in England, although not on the same scale as back in the Victorian era, no doubt. I am from the north of England (Yorkshire) and northerners, even today, have a reputation for speaking their mind and being somewhat brash. We are also known for being friendly and open, where as southerners are thought of as being unfriendly (even rude) and looking down their noses at northerners. These are all stereotypes, you understand, but there is no smoke without fire, as they say.
The story centres around the town of Milton and, in my opinion, the actual town is the protagonist, rather than Marageret Hale. Margaret is the voice of the book and it is through her eyes that we see this new world that she inhabits; we see her eyes open to the poverty and suffering of her townsfolk, the difference between those who have and those who have not, but it is Milton who is the largest character.
Margaret quickly befriends a local man, Nicholas Higgins, who is a mill worker and struggling to bring up his two daughters, Betsy and Mary, after his wife’s death. Bessy is gravely ill from “fluff” which Margaret discovers is a result of working in one of the factories and she is appalled by the conditions that this family, and others around the Higgins’ have to live in. She takes it out on John Thornton, a self-made businessman and mill-owner and who is also a pupil of her father (he is studying literature with him) and when the workers start to revolt and strike against the mill-owners she believes that Mr Thornton has done wrong by his workers. Mr Thornton is a proud man, and although he is in love with Margaret, he knows that he will never be good enough for her and he is aware of Margaret’s dislike and contempt for him and his ways but he cannot help falling passionately in love with her. When the riots occur at the factory Margaret shields him with her own body when they start to throw things at him and afterwards he confesses his love for Margaret which horrifies her as she has acted upon charity and would have done the same for anyone.
The move to Milton and change of scenery and circumstances affect the whole family very badly, especially Margaret’s mother, Mrs Hale, whose health is continuously failing her. Margaret, knowing that her mother doesn’t have long left to live, gets in touch with her brother Frederic (whom is a family secret as Frederic is a former officer of the Navy and is in hiding and wanted for having been the ringleader of a mutiny). His return would cost him his life, but Margaret takes the risk for her mothers sake and writes him a letter begging him to return as soon as possible. Frederic arrives and spends some time with his beloved family, but has to leave almost immdiately as he is terrified of being discovered. Mr Thornton sees him & his sister saying their goodbyes at the station and takes them for lovers. That is the first time that Margaret realizes she cares about the possible loss of his good opinion of her and fears that she is now falling in love with him just at the time when she believes that he is falling out of love with her.
Another sad and unforseen event takes Margaret back to London to stay with her cousin Edith and her family, but she doesn’t relalise that Mr Thornton is going through a financial crisis that is about to change his world too. Now you need to read it yourself to find out what happens!
I believe this book to be vitally important to understanding how far we have come today in such a short period of time; afterall it was only written 160 years ago. But more than that, for me, it is also a fantastic psychological study of human nature and behaviour and shows us how little that changes over the years: we still have strikes, rebellion, politics change very little, people still love and despair and are proud and passionate – that doesn’t change.
For anyone who loves Victorian novels, social commentary, history in the making and love stories – this is for you!
Has anyone else read this book? What did you think?
This is a wonderful novel, with parts to make you think and parts to move your heart. It even holds up to reading more than once.
I agree, Lynne. I definitely think I will read it again at some point. I think it is one of those books that you will get something different from each time you read it.
I’m so happy to read that you enjoyed this book. It is definitely one of my favourite books.
Have you read any more of hers, Iris? This was my first Gaskell.
I haven’t read it. When I read the title, I was thinking of a US tv series called North and South if I’m not mistaken.
The book sounds a bit much, but maybe I’ll pick it up sometime if I see it in the library or book shop. It sounds a little like Thomas Hardy, and I do like his books.
It’s definitely worth a read, Lee, at some point. It is gritty but has the will they/won’t they running through it to lighten it a little.
I’m so happy you reviewed this book Boof, it’s one of my favorites! Strangely enough, I haven’t read anything else by Gaskell- I’ll have to make up for that sometime soon
I need to rectify that soon too, Lua. I have Wives and Daughters and Cranford at home ready to go.
I love this book – I love Gaskell!! There’s an excellent mini-series which I’m sure you’ve seen too. It’s interesting, it has that Pride & Prej. scene where proposes and she rejects him, bang in the middle – what did you think of that?
I love how this novel really captures that, what’s the word, juxtaposition? between the quaint English gentry and old ways, and the dirty, grimy, hard way of life in the factory towns (north and south, yes?) – a changing point for British life yes? Margaret represents one, John the other, and they clash. They don’t understand each other. Their truths are different.
I also love that it gives voice to the working poor and exploited, and marks their struggles. I mean, P&P is wonderful but one of things that has always bothered me about it is how isolated the story and characters are, how, reading the novel, there’s no dirt or poverty (in the real sense, not the Dashwood sense), no conflict, nothing happening outside the gentry and upper classes. You’d think Regency England was all roses, reading Austen!
I loved the mini series, Shannon. I saw it when it first came out and have been dying to read the book ever since. Plus, Richard Armitage is dreamy as Mr Thornton
Fantastic review, Boof – I absolutely HAVE got to fill this gap in my reading soon.
I think you’d love it, Nymeth. Can’t wait to hear what you think when you do read it.
“For anyone who loves Victorian novels, social commentary, history in the making and love stories”—
That is so me! This looks great, must seek it out soon…
Yay! Hope you like it, Emily Jane
I read the book too after watching the TV series. Although they differed in parts, I loved both of them. And yes, Mr. Thornton! What a dish!
[...] Book Review: North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell « The Book Whisperer [...]
[...] North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell [...]
Hi there, I just stumbled across your blog.
I’m so glad you loved this one, I really enjoyed it too. I reviewed it awhile ago here:
http://coffeestainedpages.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/north-and-south-by-elizabeth-glaskell/
Have you seen the BBC film adaptation? It really is to die for! You should definitely check it out if you haven’t already.
[...] The Book Whisperer [...]
The first redo of Pride and Prejudice, it is briliant the way she switched Barcy and Elizabeth’s characters. The screen adaptation with dreamy Richard Armitage is mesmerizing.
Oh definitely, Judith. He is gorgeous as Mr Thornton!
[...] North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell [...]
Hello there! I am not a native English speaker and Higgins’ lines were almost impossible to understand, so I had to resource to reading both the original and a translation. By the way, the translation didn’t adapt the accents so the Higginses, the Thorntons and the Hales speak pretty much alike
, and it was good because it had many notes on all the works Gaskell cites.
The best word I can think of to describe this novel is powerful. Every character has a purpose (even Mrs. Shaw and her daughter), a mission in life, and his or her own philosophy. I suppose they represent larger groups but I find it striking how well defined is each, considering there are many characters and this is not a veryveryvery long novel. I particularly liked Mr. Bell, whose fine sense of humor reaches today readers with no trouble, and particularly disliked Fanny Thornton, whose only purpose seems to show how amazingly pretty, accomplished, intelligent and exceptional Margaret is. I wish Fanny and Edith were a little less air headed, really.
I found the body count of this novel a little extreme… come on, no less than seven characters kick the bucket in the course of two years! And one character whose demise would lead the reader to think that Margaret and Mr. Thornton will, indeed, be happy together stands strong all through the end.
A last thought here… it is very hard not to compare this novel to Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. There are plenty of things in common and things that are quite different, but what I find more outstanding is that North and South was originally made known to the public in chapters, so the author needed to inject a healthy dose of drama in each installment to keep the public interested. Maybe she even got feedback and shaped the story with it, maybe she had submitted all the story before it was printed… I don’t know, but it shows that the rhythm of the story has more shock than Austen’s stories, which were published as books long after she had finished them.
By the way, I only watched the first episode of the BBC series because I am a little hard of hearing and got lost quickly (and a little bored), and to tell you the truth I liked the book so much that I prefer the looks and sounds of my mind’s theater.